CERTIFIED REVIEWER COMMUNITY
SUPPORT SCIENCE THROUGH PEER REVIEW
In order to improve the scientific system, publish-Ing. depends on the support of numerous research institutes of various disciplines. Through their support, with only a few reviews per year, the institutes have an influence on the quality of the papers in their own research discipline and contribute to the modernisation of the science system.
JOIN OUR REVIEWER COMMUNITY
As a scientific institution you are invited to join our review community and benefit from the advantages of being a part of publish-Ing. Joining publish-Ing. is free.
Register NowTHE REVIEWER COMMUNITY
In order to improve the scientific system, publish-Ing. depends on the support of numerous research institutes of various disciplines. Through their support, with only a few reviews per year, the institutes have an influence on the quality of the papers in their own research discipline and contribute to the modernisation of the science system. Only with the voluntary support of research institutes and a high quality of papers and reviews the platform can succeed and help to improve science.
Benefits for Institutes
Joining the publish-Ing. reviewer community gives research institutes a direct role in shaping the quality of their discipline. With only a few reviews per year, your faculty strengthens its own field, supports open science, and gains tangible returns for your institution.
Cost Reduction
Member institutes receive significantly lower publication fees and benefit from faster review cycles for their affiliated researchers. The savings can be redirected to other research priorities while still maintaining a strong publication output.
Quality Focus
By reviewing papers in your own discipline, your institute directly elevates the quality of published research. Each review you contribute is a vote for rigor, reproducibility, and methodological excellence in your field.
Knowledge Hub
All members receive free, full-text access to the entire publish-Ing. library. Use it as a curated knowledge repository for literature reviews, teaching, grant applications, and staying current with peer research worldwide.
Community
Connect with scientists from other leading institutes, exchange feedback on emerging research directions, and build relationships that lead to collaborations, joint projects, and shared academic initiatives beyond the review desk.
REVIEWER RESPONSIBILITIES
Reviewers should evaluate the papers based on the manuscript's merits. Age, race, colour, ethnicity, gender, religious beliefs, sexual orientation and institutional affiliation must not influence the review. The reviewers must complete their work within the timeframe set by the editor.
Reviewers must also refuse to review any manuscript for which they have a conflict of interest. Although a critical evaluation of the papers is appropriate, the reviewers should formulate their comments in a positive tone.
The content of contributions is confidential until the papers are officially published. Reviewers must refrain from seizing information in unpublished or rejected papers for their own purposes.